Ronald Jackson
Across the River and into the TreesRonald Jackson is Richard Cantwell’s enlisted driver, a soldier whose military credentials sit alongside a civilian identity rooted in a garage partnership in Wyoming. The novel presents him chiefly through brief exchanges with the Colonel: he discusses art, explains his connection to the Battle of the Rapido River, and repeats an assignment in language that preserves a measure of personal latitude. Cantwell regards him as someone who entered uniform unwillingly, but Jackson’s conduct gives that judgment a more complicated human scale.
Identity and Background
Jackson serves as Cantwell’s driver while Burnham is away at the rest centre in Cortina. When Cantwell mistakes him for Burnham, Jackson identifies himself plainly, and the Colonel acknowledges his own confusion. The moment establishes their working relationship and Jackson’s place in Cantwell’s immediate military routine.
Jackson’s civilian life was in Rawlins, Wyoming, where he had been partners with his brother in a garage. Cantwell asks whether he intends to return there, but the available exchange does not give Jackson’s answer. His former partnership nevertheless supplies a specific point of reference beyond his army rank and duties: he has a trade and a family connection outside military service.
Service and the Rapido River
Jackson had served in the Thirty-Sixth Division and had been at the Battle of the Rapido River. When Cantwell’s remarks prompt a reference to the battle, Jackson quickly apologizes, explaining that he did not mean to be insolent or disrespectful. His response suggests both personal involvement in the campaign and an awareness of the difference between recalling combat and speaking casually to a senior officer about it.
Cantwell’s view of Jackson is openly ambivalent. He recognizes the combat infantryman badge and Purple Heart Jackson wears, yet privately regards him as a man placed in uniform against his will rather than, in the Colonel’s stricter sense, a soldier. Cantwell also believes Jackson remained in the army for his own purposes. That is the Colonel’s interpretation, not a motive Jackson explains in the cited exchanges, and the distinction matters: the novel places Jackson’s visible service record beside Cantwell’s skepticism without resolving the tension into a simple verdict.
Work and Exchanges with Cantwell
Jackson’s curiosity extends beyond military matters. He asks Cantwell about painters because he had gone to a major art collection in Florence to see paintings of Madonnas. Cantwell responds that he knows something about painters, turning a moment of mistaken identity and road conversation into an exchange in which the driver introduces an interest of his own.
Their conversations also show Jackson negotiating the conventions of rank. He addresses Cantwell as sir and apologizes after the Rapido reference, but he is not merely silent or interchangeable with the other enlisted men in Cantwell’s thoughts. He asks questions, offers personal context, and, when instructed to repeat a plan for the following morning, gives the order a lightly qualified formulation.
Assignment and Characterization
Cantwell directs Jackson to present himself in the lobby of the Gritti Palace Hotel at eleven the next morning, stay out of the Colonel’s sight, and have some fun. Jackson repeats the instructions, identifying himself by service rank and serial number, but modifies the final aim into making every reasonable attempt to achieve it. The wording follows the order while making its limits explicit; the exchange gives Jackson a small, distinctive voice within a strict military hierarchy.
Jackson’s narrative role is therefore not defined by a major independent action but by the contrast between record, perception, and manner. He has combat credentials and a history connected to the Rapido, while Cantwell doubts that he is a soldier in the deeper professional sense. His apology, interest in painting, civilian work, and careful restatement of orders keep him from becoming only an object of the Colonel’s judgment. The evidence leaves his future and his own account of military service unstated.


